|
SITE MAP: Announcements Current News/Comments Recent
News 9/11 and WTC Issues Best Streaming Videos Op-Ed Articles Recommendations Archives
(2002-2007) CONTACT US: ron@libertycalling.com TALK RADIO SHOW: Go
to Ron Larsen’s LIBERTY CALLING LIVE Talk Show over Live365 SPONSOR: Hill Country Benefits ALTERNATIVE RADIO American Voice Radio Truth Radio GCN Live Republic Broadcasting The Micro Effect TALK SHOWS The American Disquisition, with Drew Raines
WEB SERVICES Time (Official, US) SEARCH ENGINES: KNOWLEDGE BASES: GOVERNMENT: Supreme Court
(SC) SC: Historic Decisions United
States CodeNewspeak - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia MONEY MATTERS: ALTERNATIVE NEWS MAJOR NEWS : BBC
News (U.K.) Guardian
(U.K.) Independent
(U.K.) Reuters (World) Reuters (Politics) OTHER NEWS Human Events
COLUMNISTS Rep.
Ron Paul
HOMeLAND ATTACKS SELF-DEFENSE SPECIAL TOPICS The Pentagon
Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows |
Liberty
Calling Previous News and Commentary – Dec. 2007 December 31 The Plot Thickens on Fox-Paul Story: Has Fox News Excluded Ron Paul? pt. 2On December 27, the Associated Press reported:
"The
New Hampshire Republican Party is sponsoring a forum for Republican
presidential candidates on Jan. 6, two days before the state's
first-in-the-nation primary." Later in the article, the AP
stated: "Participating in the forum will be Rudy Giuliani, Mike
Huckabee, John McCain, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson." On the evening of December 28, Jared Chicoine and Jordan
Brown of our New Hampshire campaign staff met in person with Fergus Cullen
the New Hampshire GOP chairman to discuss whether or not Dr. Paul would be
invited to participate in the forum. Mr. Cullen confirmed there will be
an event on January 6, but he could not confirm whether or not Dr. Paul would
be invited. We also learned the event would not be a debate with an audience,
but instead would be a forum in a closed studio with the candidates
questioned only by Chris Wallace of Fox News. A few hours after that meeting, we contacted Fox News
seeking clarification. Later that night, we issued a press
release while waiting to hear from Fox News. On December 29, the Baltimore Sun featured a report by Jason
George. Mr. George reported, "Calls and emails to Fox News
spokespersons by the Tribune were not returned Saturday evening. "An official at the New Hampshire GOP, which is
co-sponsoring the event with Fox, said that Paul might still be included, but
the planning for the debate was still coming together and it was ultimately
Fox's call." As of late afternoon today (December 30), we have nothing
more to report. Kent Snyder LC Edtor’s Comment: Apparently WorldNetDaily.com also had
the facts wrong early Sunday afternoon (Dec. 30) when they reported the
debate had been canceled several weeks ago and that Mr. Paul had not seen the
memo canceling the event and so was “steamed” over Fox’s excluding him from
the debate. It’s evident that Mr.
Snyder added to the confusion in this matter in his press release, which
states that Mr. Paul had been excluded from the debate, when in fact Mr.
Cullen had told him that he could not confirm whether or or not Dr. Paul
would be invited. Bhutto
Broke her Agreement with the CIA According to the manar
newspaper the CIA in coordination with Musharraf’s ISI [International
Services Intelligence (ISI) of Pakistan] are behind the assassination of
Benazir Bhutto. Musharraf briefed the Americans that Bhutto contacted the
Islamic movement in Pakistan to reach an agreement for reconciliation leading
to future stability of the country and breaking Pakistan link with American
war-on -terror. This explanation seems logical, few days ago two British
diplomats were expelled from Afghanistan for conducting talks with
the Taliban [check out this link also,
very funny and true said about the Americans: The Americans have a way of
painting this black and white,……For them it’s like a cowboy film - you’re
either a good guy or a bad guy.] Dollar
Heads for Annual Declines Against Euro, Yen on Fed Cuts In a
Prescient Interview, Bhutto Fingered Assassination Suspects America
Could Plunge into Extended Japan-Like Recession: Yale University’s
Peter Shiller Tapes
by CIA Lived and Died to Save Image Individual
Privacy under Threat in Europe and US: Report by Privacy International
– See
Article & Map NY
Times Bestselling Author Aims at 9/11 Coverup with Both Barrels Blazing with
a Novel Your Reality
Tunnel: Everyone Sits in the Prison of his own Ideas – Text and Audio Fantastic! The State's
Language of Menace: Karen Kwiatowski
on Glenn Beck’s Interview of Ron Paul Bright
Ideas: Innovative Minds Don’t Think Alike Weekend, December 29-30 Scheherazade in the White House: How George Bush’s Wartime
Administration used a Magician, Hollywood Designers and Karl Rove telling
1,001 Stories to Sell the Invasion of Iraq – Christian Salmon A few days before the 2004
presidential election, Ron Suskind, a columnist who had been investigating
the White House and its communications for years, wrote in The New York
Times about a conversation he had with a presidential adviser in 2002.
“The aide said that guys like me were ‘in what we call the reality-based
community’, which he defined as people ‘who believe that solutions emerge
from your judicious study of discernible reality’. I nodded and murmured something
about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ‘That’s not the
way the world really works anymore,’ he continued. ‘We’re an empire now, and
when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that
reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new
realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out.
We’re history’s actors.. and you, all of you, will be left to just study what
we do’ ” (1). (By
Christian Salmon, in La Mode diplomatique, January 2008). Full article=> Mitt
Romney's Pursuit of Tyrannical Power, Literally -- Glenn Greenwald In yet another superb piece of journalism, the peerless Charlie Savage
of The Boston Globe submitted to the leading presidential candidates a
questionnaire asking their views on 12 key questions regarding executive
power… All of the leading Democrats
-- Edwards, Dodd, Biden, Clinton, Richardson and Obama -- submitted
responses, as did Mitt Romney, John McCain and Ron Paul… But by far the most extraordinary answers come from Mitt Romney. Romney's responses -- not to some of the questions but to
every single one of them -- are beyond disturbing. The powers he claims the
President possesses are definitively -- literally -- tyrannical, unrecognizable
in the pre-2001 American system of government and, in some meaningful ways,
even beyond what the Bush/Cheney cadre of authoritarian legal theorists have
claimed. (Glenn Greenwald,
Salon.com, December 23, 2007) Full
article=> Excerpt: They
Thought They were Free: The Germans, 1933-1945 – By Milton Mayer "What no one seemed to notice," said a
colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after
1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this
gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know,
it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a
people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense,
or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing
one is governing. "What
happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to
being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to
believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to
act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous
that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released
because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler,
their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who
would otherwise have worried about it. Full article=> LC
Editor’s Comment: Think about this: They Thought they were Free: The Americans, 2001-2007. Ron Paul is steamed about being excluded from a New
Hampshire debate scheduled to be televised by Fox News. "They are scared
of me and don't want my message to get out, but it will," Paul said of
Fox News Network. "They are propagandists for this war and I challenge
them on the notion that they are conservative." The challenge got some attention on a slow
Internet news day yesterday, with many websites still carrying the story.
However, not all is what it appears. There is no debate. No one is invited. It was canceled. Somehow, Ron Paul missed the memo. There is no New Hampshire
GOP presidential debate scheduled for Jan. 6. The event was officially
canceled three weeks ago. Ron Paul was, indeed, invited, but never committed
to attending before the event was canceled because of the close proximity with
the ABC event. (World Net Daily,
Sunday, December 30, 2007). Full
article=> LC Editor’s Comment: With fresh, wet egg on my face, I apologize
for my possibly riling up LC readers without first going to the principals
involved in the Fox story, that is, Ron Paul and even Fox itself, and
checking out the story with them before passing on Anthony Wade’s article to
you with my comments. However, I
still stand by suggestions 2 and 3 contained in my LC Editor’s comments
following the now erroneous) Fox News Fascism story (below). Fox
News Fascism – Ron Paul Excluded From Debates by Rupert Murdock Fox
News has made its bones off of being a fake news agency. Everyone knows it.
While it worked for several years the shine has begun to diminish and the
people are waking up to the real damage it can do to mainstream media.
Granted, most mainstream media is really no better than Fox News, as they are
all corporately controlled by companies that are in bed with the war machine.
MSNBC is learning the lessons now as such obviously biased hosts such as Joe
Scarborough and Tucker Carlson have failed miserably next to the more honest
Keith Olbermann. America is slowly coming around to the notion that news
should actually be fundamentally fair. Fox of course has been notoriously
unfair and imbalanced for years now. Thus it should come as no surprise that
Fox News has decided to once again try to subvert the democratic process by
excluding Dr. Ron Paul from their upcoming GOP debate in New Hampshire. (By
Anthony Wade, in OpEdNews.com, December 29, 2007). Full
article => LC Editor’s Comments: So Rupert
Murdock, rather than serve the needs of the American viewing and listening
public, which is to be able to witness a live, open, honest debate between
all major contenders for the nomination of the Republican candidate for the
office of president in the elections scheduled for November 2008, has chosen
to obey the orders of his handlers: Exclude Rep. Ron Paul from the debates in
New Hampshire. The reason for this move on the part of the leaders of the War
Party, whose members include all of the major contenders for the U.S.
presidency from both parties with the exception of Ron Paul, is that the
Texas representative’s message of hope for the restoration the U.S. republic,
a return to honesty in government and adherence to the rule of law based on
the U.S. Constitution, and establishment of sound money policy constitutes a
threat to their agenda, which is that of creating and sustaining wars for profit
and making the American people pay for those wars in blood and dollars. Dr. Paul’s simple message has continued to resonate with the
needs of the American people, who have demonstrated their enthusiastic
support of his message and his drive for the White House by contributing
record dollar levels of campaign support money, the establishing and
maintaining of a high level of focused, aggressive activity a grass root
campaign organization, and causing him to win countless straw polls conducted
throughout the U.S. over the past six months. Furthermore, in past television debates, Dr. Paul has given his
advesaries a run for their money, often trouncing them but always setting the
record straight, while all the time maintaining his professionalism and remaining
calm under pressure. Ron Paul’s candidacy constitutes a terrible threat to the agenda
of the War Party. You better believe it.
So he had to be excluded from the New Hampshire debates. Murdock was the person chosen to do the
job. This is no time for outpourings of anger and tears. Instead, it is time for effective action
now by the Paul team. What are we the
supporters of Ron Paul’s drive for the White House to do to cause Murdock to
back down or if that does not work compensate for Ron Paul’s presence during
the debates? I have three suggestions to offer. (1) Call into all
talk shows, tell the story on air -- Fox News Fascism: Ron Paul
Excluded from Debates --- and ask each host's listeners to call into FOX
telecasts and demand that Rupert Murdock include Ron Paul in FOX's coverage
of the debates. Be persistent but friendly, using humor wherever
possible to get the job done. Calls
into C-Span on air should bear fruit. (2) Double the number of
contacts you make each day to promote Ron Paul's campaign to your friends and
direct them at the very least to the Ron Paul 2008 website or better yet to
to the www.libertycalling.com site and/or www.amd.elequity.com , where you and they
will find links to all the information they will every needs to convince them
that all the other candidates on both sides of the aisle want more government
spending and wars without end. Then each day make one additional contact.
If you have not made any contacts so far, start with one per day. (3) Get connected locally with
a Ron Paul Meet-up Group. Find out where and when your local
Meet-up groups assemble and then attend at least one meeting and then perhaps
even join. To find a local Meet-up Group go to http://ronpaul.meetup.com . Join
and take guidance from the group you join on what to do next. Good
luck. See you at the top with Ron
Paul. Bush
Rejects Another Iraq War Spending Law: Says Law would Impair Funding of Iraq
Reconstruction LC Editor’s Comments: The spending bill as passed by
Congress was structured this way intentionally, knowing that the president
would refused to sign it into law, and for good reason: There is more than adequate documentation
to prove that billions of dollars in funding authorized by Congress in the
past to support the reconstruction of Iraq were simply stolen, wasted or
misused. Examples: Billions
Wasted in Iraq -- U.S. Official says Oversight was Non-Existent; Money
for Nothing: Billions of Dollars have Disappeared, Gone to Bribe Iraqis and
Line Contractors’ Pockets; U.S. Audit Finds
Spectacular Waste of Funds in Iraq -- Millions
Lost in 'Chaotic Misuse,' While Report Says many Reconstruction Projects
won't be Finished. Now Mr. Bush is asking Congress to authorize
additional funds to be thrown down the Iraq rat hole, more properly called a
cash cow for the president’s business friends and allies. So the men and women on Capitol Hill have
wisely chosen to call it quits in participating in this massive game of fraud
and misuse of the American taxpayers money.
The Constitution provides only two ways to stop a
president: impeach him and remove him from office or cut off his funding, and
it apparently has chosen to do the latter, for the moment at least. But isn’t it time now for Congress to bite the
bullet: To impeach both Bush and his handler, Dick Cheney, and have the U.S.
Marine Corp remove them from office and put them on a slow boat to Paraguay,
where the Bush’s purchased thousands of acres of land last year, apparently
to serve as their secure enclave whenever the American people finally
wised-up? Interestingly enough, Paraguay
has no criminal extradition laws. LC Editor’s Question to Readers: Can we Americans afford to
have Bush and Cheney remain in office for yet another year destroying our
economy and bleeding us financially dry in the name of fighting an illegally
initiated war, supporting the use of extra rendition and torture for detainee
interrogations, thereby making a mockery of America’s claim to be “the land
of the free and home of the brave”, and condoning if not actively supporting
criminal activity on the part of government officials? See Call for Cheney Impeachment
Hearings and sign the
petition supporting impeachment hearings provide at the site. We need to take swift, decisive action now
against the criminal cabal that took over the White House following the coup
of November 2000. Reuters
Poll for Iowa: Clinton leads in Iowa; Huckabee, Romney even at 28 Pct and Ron
Paul at 8 Pct McClatchy-MSNBC
Poll in Iowa: Mitt Romney has Regained the Lead among Iowa Republicans Bin
Laden Issues Warning on Iraq, Israel
New. More Mossad and CIA-assisted talk from the
grave. $671M
in Federal Funding of
National Defense Center for Environmental Excellence a Waste: Study CIA
Torture and other War Crimes – Philip Giraldi The
FCC’s Gift to Big Media Another case of
gov’t and business walking hand-in-hand, a.k.a fascism. Coming
soon in the New Amerika: The Laser Gun Police can use to Destroy your Car
with you in it Fungus May be
Causing Your Sinus Infections--Here's What Can Help – Dr. Mercola The Aerocivic:
Ugly as Sin, But Hey - It Gets 95 MPG December 28 Bhutto
Assassination Upends Bush Strategy in Southeast Asia Navy Judge
Advocate General (JAG) Resigns Over Torture Issue |